Sunday, October 2, 2011

ashton kutcher and demi moore

images Power Couple: Demi Moore ashton kutcher and demi moore. Ashton Kutcher Demi Moore
  • Ashton Kutcher Demi Moore

  • soma
    02-12 10:30 PM
    just lobbying won't get us anywhere, class action lawsuit would make them listen!!!

    wallpaper Ashton Kutcher Demi Moore ashton kutcher and demi moore. Ashton Kutcher And Demi Moore
  • Ashton Kutcher And Demi Moore

  • chanduv23
    09-26 01:47 PM
    US economy situation is alarming. I doubt they will consider any immigration related bill until financial crisis stablises.2009 will be the key.Economy has to stablise. If not anti immigrants will block any bill citing the economy as the reason. If unemployment increases every month then any immigration reform is distance possiblity.Illegal immigrants are is getting publicity every year by rally for past 4 years but nothing happened. Pro immigrants are trying to block E-verify and some other anti immigration reforms. Anti immigrants are trying to block pro immigrant reforms. So any immigration reforms will be stalled until some compromise reached by moderates

    How are you my friend, it has been a while since I seen you. Have you sent your emails yet?

    ashton kutcher and demi moore. Demi Moore (L-R) Ashton
  • Demi Moore (L-R) Ashton

  • Ramba
    02-12 02:25 PM
    Yeah, Tell me about it!!!

    Just two more months and mine would have been current!!!!

    I wish your hopes comes true. However, one thing you should remember. There are many guys with PD before 2005 got stuck due to name check, particularly in ROW catagory. This big jump in PD for ROW and new name check clearance rule, will makes tons of 485s become eligible for approval in March.

    As they mentioned in their comment, they may freeze the PD for ROW in APril or move back to 2004, depending on how many EB3-ROW gets GC in March.

    2011 Ashton Kutcher And Demi Moore ashton kutcher and demi moore. demi moore and ashton kutcher
  • demi moore and ashton kutcher

  • rsharma
    10-07 04:40 PM
    I have built a very simple EB2-I Visa predition model

    Making following assumption

    15000 new EB2 ROW I-485 applications
    12000 new EB1 I-485 applications
    EB4/EB5 use 70% of allocated visa (30% spillover)

    EB2 Visa Bulletin prediction for FY 2010
    Bulletin Quarterly-spillover Annual Spillover
    Oct-09 22-Jan-2005 22-Jan-2005
    Nov-09 22-Jan-2005 22-Jan-2005
    Dec-09 31-Mar-2005 1-Feb-2005
    Jan-10 31-Mar-2005 15-Feb-2005
    Feb-10 31-Mar-2005 31-Mar-2005
    Mar-10 31-Mar-2006 31-Mar-2005
    Apr-10 31-Mar-2006 31-Mar-2005
    May-10 31-Mar-2006 31-Mar-2005
    Jun-10 15-Oct-2006 31-Mar-2005
    Jul-10 15-Oct-2006 30-Sep-2005
    Aug-10 15-Oct-2006 30-Apr-2007
    Sep-10 31-Mar-2007 30-May-2007

    I would be very happy if your predictions come true. But it appears you have not taken into consideration of the fact that thousands of EB3 might move over to Eb2.


    ashton kutcher and demi moore. Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher
  • Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher

  • Legal
    07-22 02:12 PM
    Here's an Apr-2006 EB2-I approval posted today on Murthy forum:

    suspect he is spreading rumor. not clear what his country of chargeability is, since he did not respond to this question.

    ashton kutcher and demi moore. Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore
  • Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore

  • poorslumdog
    09-04 12:38 PM
    I'm not a free loader like you....Have contributed and still want to contribute...Its just that I cancelled my CC(the source of funds) that I need to reactivate.

    Dont tell me your crap stroy. First do it and then we can talk.


    ashton kutcher and demi moore. Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher
  • Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher

  • villamonte6100
    12-14 02:39 PM
    I think you are taking it so personal. I am not opposing this idea. In fact, I suggested to check with your immigration lawyers and share what they say.

    All I'm saying is that, in my personal view, I don't see any discrimination on the existing law you are pointing out. I don't see anyone being discriminated. It just so happen that we belong to 4 countries affected by this quota.

    If we can ask the US government to probably give exception to us, I think that's one idea. But that's absolutely remote.

    My country of origin has got nothing to do with what we are talking here. You are taking so personal because you might have been waiting for your GC for quite sometime. Well, we are just on the same boat.

    This is an open forum my friend. So please take it easy.

    Just so that we can understand the background of your continues opposition to this idea, could you please let us know your country of origin? Also some information about which state chapter you belong to will be great if you don't mind. :)


    2010 Demi Moore (L-R) Ashton ashton kutcher and demi moore. Power Couple: Demi Moore
  • Power Couple: Demi Moore

  • belmontboy
    05-29 06:37 PM
    I have been saying this for the past one year, let us forget everything else, let us not come up with new rules or ideas or suggestions (new quotas, fraud detection, sue USCIS fund, exteneded APs etc). Focus all our energies on the one issue that will help everyone from all affected countries....Recapture of Unused Visas.

    Recapture campaign will not divide us in EB 1 Vs 2 Vs 3 or countries. Over the past year a number of people have quit because of the bickering.
    Recapture has a precedent because it was approved by Clinton earlier.
    Recapture is free of country caps and it does not affect the existing visas. Murthy's article mentions that 120k are stuck in limbo and we know that there are around 400k visas available...i dont know what more motivation people need to fight for this issues.

    On our own each one of us can do the following:
    a) Try to arrange a meeting with your congressman and senators
    b) write a letter to all members of the Judicary committee

    after that do whatever IV tells you to do

    If its recapture, then so be it.
    BTW, 120k is just indians. What about chinese, mexicans??

    instead of try on our own, why don't we group ourselves - as someone suggested 100-150 should be good enough.
    Lets group and mail president, chief of staff, your local senator, and few others (who favor legal immigration).

    can some good english pundits draw a sample letter highlighting our cause and need for visa recapture?

    Also lets have a poll and get list of participants.

    The plan shall be mail one letter to each every week. All it would cost you is a printout, an envelope, a 42cents stamp and 5 minutes. Its not too much asking though

    Any body has better suggestions?


    ashton kutcher and demi moore. Demi Moore#39;s derriere is all
  • Demi Moore#39;s derriere is all

  • go_guy123
    06-12 12:01 AM
    "Now with this huge deluge of immigrants, especially from the desi consulting companies, I feel that my quality of life is getting adversely impacted. Do not rush to conclusions that I am anti Indian or anti immigrant. 12 years back when I first got my H1 visa, the requirements to qualify were strict. "

    i am not interested in giving red or blue dots but i do hope your citizenship application gets stuck in a processing delay, you too will then realize the implication of your so called Darwinian flush :rolleyes: As they say...when it happens to others its a recession, when it happens to you it turns into a depression...good luck..

    I hope your post did not imply that the ones who got GC's were the 'brightest and the best'.

    citizenship application is actually speeded up when democratic party is in power

    hair demi moore and ashton kutcher ashton kutcher and demi moore. Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher
  • Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher

  • vdlrao
    07-22 01:45 PM
    Here's an Apr-2006 EB2-I approval posted today on Murthy forum:

    Please post the priorirty date of EB2 India/China approvals along with the approval date information, in the following thread ,for EB2 India/china approvals from Aug 2008 bulletin released date(Jul 11th).

    I know they will approve pending EB2 India/China applications which they process even before Aug 1st 2008.

    Please post the approvals information in the following thread and update the IV Tracker so that it would be informative(helpful) for all of us.


    ashton kutcher and demi moore. GAME RELATED: ASHTON KUTCHER

  • vdlrao
    07-25 07:55 PM
    See we came to know from our calculations there are about 10 times increase in EB2 India visas. So that means we are getting visas of 10 years in a single year!!!!!. But theres not much change in the demand of EB2. The demand is amost same as of the previous years. But the supply has increased to 10 times. So in two years, 2008 and 2009, we are getting of 20 years visas. So assuming there were no spill overs, and 20 years from now means in 2028 , wouldn't it be possible to clear off all the EB2s (with out spill overs) with the PDs on or before 2008. So does it make any sense of EB2 getting close to current very soon with the spill overs.

    hot Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher ashton kutcher and demi moore. Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher
  • Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher

  • nixstor
    07-03 04:14 PM
    Wrote to Jennifer Ludden at NPR who regularly reports on immigration
    email addresses are first name initial followed by lastname at npr dot org, if you would like to write


    house Ashton Kutcher amp; Demi Moore: ashton kutcher and demi moore. Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher
  • Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher

  • Legal
    07-26 10:31 AM
    According to my analysis based on recipted/pending I-485 they processed some 80-90K (estimated range) EB I-485 applications which 57/65% of 140k by April 2008.

    May month usage was very low, i feel June/July not to bump too much so another 20k cases. We should still have FB rollover from 07 (31K) + another 10k visa in the pool for Aug/Sept visa.

    It appears FB spillover is factored into EB quota in Sep bulletin every year.

    tattoo Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore ashton kutcher and demi moore. Watch quot;Demi Moore posts bikini
  • Watch quot;Demi Moore posts bikini

  • longq
    02-14 12:50 PM
    The entire discussion by EB3-ROW guys want to preserve those recaptured unused numbers in 2000 only for EB3-ROW for ever. As I mentioned earlier, the purpose of that recapture is to eliminate backlog in 1999. India and China were only the two countries backlogged at that point. USCIS could do that job only in 2005. You guys want a controlled allocation of recaptured numbers for years and years with the simple intension of EB3-ROW always should be current. I understand that urge. However, you guys forget the reality. EB3 demand is huge due to 245i. The real demand for EB2 always very less. (The real demand for EB2 is when EB3 were current). Now everyone is going to EB2. I feel that is the reason why EB2-India and China getting penalized as DOS took the law in their own hand. Now EB2 guys are victimized. Do not blame India and China took more numbers. The real fact is EB3-ROW is enjoying with the expense of EB2.

    Furthermore all this mess is due cumulative results allowing 245i without increasing visa numbers (this is major one), failure of DOL in processing LC in time, USCIS inefficiency, dealy in processing 485 due to 911, abuse in labor substitution, abuse of massive filing of GC by body shoppers with out a bonafide permanent positions or ability to pay, opening a firms in fast labor processing states just to file GC etc. The list for this mess is end less. No one wants to fix that. If they fix everything, there will be less demand for EB3 visas. Furthermore some thing can not be fixed. One can not request/litigate DOL or USCIS to process the LC or 485 fast. Therefore, everyone in EB3 has to wait. Other option is to educate the law makers the problems due to this mess to fix those. Everyone wants CIR/SKIL bill and no one wants to fix the current system and abuse. So, one has to wait, wait, wait..


    pictures Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher ashton kutcher and demi moore. 272495 demi moore et ashton
  • 272495 demi moore et ashton

  • Macaca
    07-04 01:01 PM
    My point is not to discourage any one, but when we wirte to media, folks will investigate all before they publish to main stream. We need to be fair and should provide the correct information, else we might loose the coverage.

    This is important. I am updating my original template and putting the name of the person who said it. That person should be able to stand up when needed!

    Also, please look at all possible holes in my points. We need to be rock solid!

    dresses Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher ashton kutcher and demi moore. ashton kutcher demi moore
  • ashton kutcher demi moore

  • kondur_007
    01-13 09:19 PM
    However what we as a community should realize is this is just the first trick under the sleeves of anti-immigrants supported by grassley and co. Once consulting companies are out of the picture, they will target permanent employers with conditions like "the company should not have fired any US citizen in the past 6 months or plan to layoff any citizen in the upcoming 6 months." They could come up with additional restrictions for direct employers as well.

    Exactly my point.


    makeup Demi Moore#39;s derriere is all ashton kutcher and demi moore. Ashton Kutcher amp; Demi Moore:
  • Ashton Kutcher amp; Demi Moore:

  • dvb123
    02-16 02:22 PM
    I think this discussion is enough. The ratio of persons wanting to file a case agains't USCIS is more than 85% . The poll never reduced to less than 85% even after a lot of members were added at different intervals.

    We need plaintiffs. People who have been working for fortune 500 companies or govt organisations or non profit organisations or university research or commercial research organisations will be the best fit because they will have a clean immigration history? I think we need a seperate thread for plaintiffs or a seperate group. What do u guys say? Somebody can also contact AILA also about plaintiffs. We may need to start a seperate thread or seperate yahoo group for plaintiffs.

    girlfriend Watch quot;Demi Moore posts bikini ashton kutcher and demi moore. Ashton Kutcher has no fears
  • Ashton Kutcher has no fears

  • JunRN
    02-12 07:55 PM
    We are???? I am not expecting a C against all categories ever again! If anything can move the dates significantly, it is things like recapturing of unused visa numbers. Oh BTW, did you send your letter?

    I am not saying "C" nor am I saying "July 2007 VB". I am talking about "June 2007 VB". It is just a matter of time when we can see the VB back to June 2007 figure again.

    I can assure you that I have done my part without telling anyone. I am a silent doer.

    hairstyles GAME RELATED: ASHTON KUTCHER ashton kutcher and demi moore. Ashton Kutcher, Demi Moore
  • Ashton Kutcher, Demi Moore

  • kondur_007
    07-26 06:04 PM
    I dont think the situation is that bleak. What would happen when EB3 ROW is unable to use up all the spillovers from EB2? The excess would go to EB3 I, right?

    This is exactly the point which is not clear and therefore, asking for verticle spillover may not benefit EB3 I.

    What you are asking for is "verticle spill" till it comes to EB3 ROW and then spill it "horizontally" to EB3 I, then only EB3 I would benefit. (although USCIS did this in the past, there is no logic that can explain it)

    If they re-interprete the spill and make it verticle, it will go EB2 ROW -> EB 3 ROW -> EB2 I -> EB3 I (pure verticle spill) ; In this case, EB3 I gets nothing but EB2 I looses with some benefit to EB3 ROW. And remember, verticle spill from ROW will need to go equally to India and China...

    At the end of the day, if you look at the big picture, I think horizontal or verticle spills are not likely to make any difference to the backlog of EB3 I. What we need is more visa number. Mechanism (recapture, STEM exemption etc) does not matter. Also we neet to unite and work on getting our agenda in the CIR that is likely to be awakened once elections are over.

    05-29 05:08 PM
    I agree that we need to be united. But does that mean we just accept people abusing EB1?
    Dont you think it is unfair to people who have waited for all these years?
    If more people start abusing EB1, then there will be no visa numbers for EB2/EB3.
    When EB1 abuse is stopped, It may not get all of us GC, but atleast some of us could get GC.

    We need to fix the problem of too few visa numbers available to I/C. If the waits in EB2/3 are not long, there is no reason there will be any significant abuse of EB1 visas. You are targetting a mosquito and ignoring the elephant in the room.

    09-27 11:21 AM
    I feel that this will be an excellent idea. Atleast some people will be eliminated from the queue. I believe there are lot of people waiting for their GC to buy a home. It will also benefit them.

    I sent the emails to some of the senators in the list.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment